Assessment of the Impact of Subcutaneous Catheter Change on Glucose Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Treated by Insulin Pump in Open- and Closed-Loop Modes.

Introduction: Most continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) catheters (KT) are changed every 3 days. This study aims at evaluating whether KT changes impact glucose control while under open-loop (OL) or automated insulin delivery (AID) modes. Methods: We included patients with type 1 diabetes who used Tandem t:slim x2 insulin pump and Dexcom G6 glucose sensor for 20 days in OL, then as AID. CSII and sensor glucose data in OL and for the past 20 days of 3-month AID were retrospectively analyzed. The percentage of time spent with sensor glucose above 180 mg/dL (%TAR180) was compared between the calendar day of KT change (D0), the next day (D1), and 2 days later (D2). Values were adjusted for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at inclusion, and %TAR180 for the 2 h before KT change. Results: A total of 1636 KT changes were analyzed in 134 patients: 72 women (54%), age: 35.6 ± 15.7 years, BMI: 25.2 ± 4.7 kg/m2, and HbA1c: 7.5 ± 0.8%. %TAR180 in the 2 h before the KT change was 51.3 ± 37.0% in OL and 33.2 ± 30.0% in AID mode. In OL, significant absolute increases of %TAR180 at D0 versus D1 (+6.9%; P < 0.0001) or versus D2 (+6.8%; P < 0.0001) were observed. In AID, significant absolute increases of %TA180R at D0 versus D1 (+4.8%; P < 0.0001) or versus D2 (+4.2%; P < 0.0001) were also observed. Conclusion: This study shows an increase in time spent in hyperglycemia on the day of the KT change both in OL and AID modes. This additional information should be taken into account to improve current AID algorithms. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04939766.

12-Month Real-Life Efficacy of the MiniMed 780G Advanced Closed-Loop System in Patients Living with Type 1 Diabetes: A French Observational, Retrospective, Multicentric Study.

Aim: To evaluate the evolution of glycemic outcomes in patients living with type 1 diabetes (T1D) after 1 year of use of the MiniMed 780G advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) system. Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicentric study in 20 centers in France. The primary objective was to evaluate the improvement in glycemic control after 1-year use of AHCL. The primary endpoint was the variation of time in range (TIR) between pre-AHCL and after 1-year use of AHCL. Secondary objectives were to analyze the glycemic outcomes after 3, 6, and 12 months of AHCL use, the safety, and the long-term observance of AHCL. Results: Two hundred twenty patients were included, and 200 were analyzed for the primary endpoint. 92.7% of patients continued to use AHCL. After 1 year of use of AHCL, TIR was 72.5% ± 10.6% (+9.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] [7.6-10.5] compared to pre-AHCL initiation, P < 0.001), HbA1c 7.1% ± 0.7% (-0.5%; 95% CI [-0.6 to -0.4]; P < 0.001), time below range 2.0% [1.0; 3.0] (0.0% [-2.0; 0.0], P < 0.001), and time above range 24.8% ± 10.9% (-7.3%; 95% CI [-8.8 to -5.7]; P < 0.001). More patients achieved the glycemic treatment goals of HbA1c <7.0% (45.1% vs. 18.1%, P < 0.001) and TIR >70% (59.0% vs. 29.5% P < 0.001) when compared with pre-AHCL. Five patients experienced severe hypoglycemia events and two patients experienced ketoacidosis. Conclusion: After 1 year of use of AHCL, people living with T1D safely improved their glucose control and a higher proportion of them achieved optimal glycemic control.

Hybrid Closed Loop Overcomes the Impact of Missed or Suboptimal Meal Boluses on Glucose Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Compared to Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy.

Background: It is unclear whether hybrid closed-loop (HCL) therapy attenuates the metabolic impact of missed or suboptimal meal insulin bolus compared with sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy in children with type 1 diabetes in free-living conditions. Methods: This is an ancillary study from a multicenter randomized controlled trial that compared 24/7 HCL with evening and night (E/N) HCL for 36 weeks in children between 6 and 12 years old. In the present study, the 60 children from the E/N arm underwent a SAP phase, an E/N HCL for 18 weeks, then a 24/7 phase for 18 weeks, extended for 36 more weeks. The last 28-30 days of each of the four phases were analyzed according to meal bolus management (cumulated 6817 days). The primary endpoint was the percentage of time that the sensor glucose was in the target range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL) according to the number of missed boluses per day. Findings: TIR was 54% ± 10% with SAP, 63% ± 7% with E/N HCL, and steadily 67% ± 7% with 24/7 HCL. From the SAP phase to 72 weeks of HCL, the percentage of days with at least one missed meal bolus increased from 12% to 22%. Estimated marginal (EM) mean TIR when no bolus was missed was 54% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 53-56) in SAP and it was 13% higher (95% CI 11-15) in the 24/7 HCL phase. EM mean TIR with 1 and ≥2 missed boluses/day was 49.5% (95% CI 46-52) and 45% (95% CI 39-51) in SAP, and it was 15% (95% CI 14-16) and 17% higher (95% CI 6-28), respectively, in the 24/7 HCL phase (P < 0.05 for all comparisons vs. SAP). Interpretation: HCL persistently improves glycemic control compared with SAP, even in case of meal bolus omission. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03739099).

Outcomes of hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery activated 24/7 versus evening and night in free-living prepubertal children with type 1 diabetes: A multicentre, randomized clinical trial.

AIM: To assess the safety and efficacy of hybrid closed-loop (HCL) insulin delivery 24/7 versus only evening and night (E/N), and on extended 24/7 use, in free-living children with type 1 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prepubertal children (n = 122; 49 females/73 males; age, 8.6 ± 1.6 years; diabetes duration, 5.2 ± 2.3 years; insulin pump use, 4.6 ± 2.5 years; HbA1c 7.7% ± 0.7%/61 ± 5 mmol/mol) from four centres were randomized for 24/7 versus E/N activation of the Tandem Control-IQ system for 18 weeks. Afterwards, all children used the activated system 24/7 for 18 more weeks. The primary outcome was the percentage of time spent in the 70-180 mg/dL glucose range (TIR). RESULTS: HCL was active 94.1% and 51.1% of the time in the 24/7 and E/N modes, respectively. TIR from baseline increased more in the 24/7 versus the E/N mode (52.9% ± 9.5% to 67.3% ± 5.6% [+14.4%, 95% CI 12.4%-16.7%] vs. 55.1% ± 10.8% to 64.7% ± 7.0% [+9.6%, 95% CI 7.4%-11.6%]; P = .001). Mean percentage time below range was similarly reduced, from 4.2% and 4.6% to 2.7%, and the mean percentage time above range decreased more in the 24/7 mode (41.9% to 30.0% [-11.9%, 95% CI 9.7%-14.6%] vs. 39.8% to 32.6% [-7.2%, 95% CI 5.0%-9.9%]; P = .007). TIR increased through the whole range of baseline levels and always more with 24/7 use. The results were maintained during the extension phase in those initially on 24/7 use and improved in those with initial E/N use up to those with 24/7 use. Neither ketoacidosis nor severe hypoglycaemia occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The current study shows the safety and efficacy of the Tandem Control-IQ system in free-living children with type 1 diabetes for both E/N and 24/7 use; 24/7 use shows better outcomes, sustained for up to 36 weeks with no safety issues.

[Technologies and type 1 diabetes: what measures and effects in adolescents?] / Nouvelles technologies et diabète de type 1 chez l'adolescent.

The management of type 1 diabetes in paediatrics has evolved considerably over the last 20 years, mainly through the use of new technologies. The challenge of managing this disease is to achieve good glycaemic control in order to prevent complications while maintaining a good quality of life. What are the current and future means of achieving this?

Effects of advanced carbohydrate counting on glucose control and quality of life in children with type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of advanced carbohydrate counting (ACC) on metabolic and quality of life (QOL) outcomes is uncertain in children with type 1 diabetes. Our aim was to determine whether ACC would improve HbA1c and QOL scores as compared with standard nutrition in this population. METHODS: We randomized 87 patients using pump and rapid-acting analogs in a 1 year randomized multicenter study (age 9.6 ± 3.5 years, diabetes duration 4.6 ± 2.7 years, HbA1c 7.8 ± 0.5% [62 ± 5 mmol/mol]). The ACC group received CC education and the control group received traditional dietary education. HbA1c was measured every 3 months. At 0 and 1 year, general, diabetes-specific, and diet-related QOL were respectively assessed by the KIDSCREEN and WHO-5 questionnaires, the diabetes-specific module of the DISABKIDS, and the diet restriction items of the DSQOLS. RESULTS: Mean HbA1c was lower in the ACC than the control group at 3 months (P < .05) and tended to be lower at 6 months (P = .10), 9 months (P = .10), but not at 12 months. The mean of individual average HbA1c during the one-year study period (from M3 to M12) was 7.63 ± 0.43 in the ACC vs 7.85 ± 0.47% in the control group (60 ± 5 vs 62 ± 5 mmol/mol)(P < .05). ACC was associated with significantly higher scores at 1 year on the KIDSCREEN children's psychological scale and the KIDSCREEN parents' physical scale, the DISABKIDS children's treatment scale, and the children's and parents' dietary restriction scales of the DSQOLS (indicating better QOL or lower perceived diet restriction). CONCLUSIONS: ACC may be associated with small improvements in metabolic control and QOL scores in children.

Evaluation of the Adherence to Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Management of Type 1 Diabetes Patients on Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy: The SENLOCOR Study.

BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy improve glucose control provided good adherence. In France, not only diabetologists, nurses, and dieticians but also nurses employed by homecare providers (HCPNs) are together involved in the initiation and/or follow-up of continuous subcutaneous insulin injection (CSII) and SAP training. The SENLOCOR Study is an observational study designed to assess SAP adherence over 6 months (primary objective). Secondary objectives included the impact of SAP on metabolic control and patients' satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CGM initiation (M0) was performed within 3 months after CSII. CGM adherence, defined by sensor wear >70% of the time, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, and satisfaction questionnaires were collected at inclusion and at 3 (M3) and 6 (M6) months. RESULTS: The analysis population was 234 patients, including 27 children. Of the physicians, 88.0% were involved in SAP education for the whole cohort (median time, 45 min), whereas HCPNs were involved in CGM training for 190 patients (81.2%) (median time: at M0, 156 min; at M3, 20 min). Good adherence was obtained in 86.1% (M0-M3) and 68.9% (M3-M6) of the patients. The HbA1c level decreased from 8.16 ± 1.35% (M0) to 7.67 ± 1.01% (M6) in 189 patients (change, -0.48%; 95% confidence interval, -0.64, -0.33). The percentage of patients who experienced severe hypoglycemia decreased from 20.7% (M0) to 13.6% (M3) and 13.3% (M6). Satisfaction scores were high. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 1 diabetes, a 6-month training on SAP involving a multidisciplinary team, and especially HCPNs, improved metabolic control with a high level of adherence and satisfaction.

Real-time continuous glucose monitoring reduces the duration of hypoglycemia episodes: a randomized trial in very low birth weight neonates.

OBJECTIVES: Hypoglycemia is frequent in very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates and compromises their neurological outcome. The aim of this study was to compare real-time continuous glucose monitoring system (RT-CGMS) to standard methods by intermittent capillary blood glucose testing in detecting and managing hypoglycemia. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-eight VLBW neonates were enrolled in this prospective study. During their 3 first days of life, their glucose level was monitored either by RT-CGMS (CGM-group), or by intermittent capillary glucose testing (IGM-group) associated with a blind-CGMS to detect retrospectively missed hypoglycemia. Outcomes were the number and duration of hypoglycemic (≤ 50 mg/dl) episodes per patient detected by CGMS. RESULTS: Forty-three monitorings were analyzed (IGM n = 21, CGM n = 22), with a median recording time of 72 hours. In the IGM group, blind-CGMS revealed a significantly higher number of hypoglycemia episodes than capillary blood glucose testing (1.2 ± 0.4 vs 0.4 ± 0.2 episode/patient, p<0.01). In the CGM-group, the use of RT-CGMS made it possible (i) to detect the same number of hypoglycemia episodes as blind-CGMS (1.2 ± 0.4 episode/patient), (ii) to adapt the glucose supply in neonates with hypoglycemia (increased supply during days 1 and 2), and (iii) to significantly reduce the duration of hypoglycemia episodes per patient (CGM 44[10-140] min versus IGM 95[15-520] min, p<0.05). Furthermore, it reduced the number of blood samples (CGM 16.9 ± 1.0 vs IGM 21.9 ± 1.0 blood sample/patient, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: RT-CGMS played a beneficial role in managing hypoglycemia in VLBW neonates by adjusting the carbohydrate supply to the individual needs and by reducing the duration of hypoglycemia episodes. The clinical significance of the biological differences observed in our study need to be explored.